An event can leave a deep impact on one’s consciousness. Though we belong to same species, but still the degree of being influenced by an event varies from individual to individual, for example win in cricket may not bring that ecstasy to a soccer fan. But, events which can cause turmoil in evolving patterns of a species have to be gigantic. The vibrations of such event, which can be considered as aftermath, should continue to elapse forever. Only then evolution can become a never ending process. It is amazing, complexity has grown over eons and we have become amazingly perplex, both at physical and conscious level. But, we are not sure how it begun to happen? We are sure though that we will continue to grow complex, adding atleast one more of layer complexity at either psychological or biological level
[1]. But we cannot determine when the layer will be added, what layer will be added, where the layer will be added, how the layer will be added, who will add the layer and finally why it will be added.
Isn’t it ironical, that we know nothing about our origin and we fail to find any clue or estimate a trajectory to conclude about our final destination? Still, we claim to know a lot. How unfortunate, our claims are nothing more than a set of hollow self-assurances. The two streams which have been influencing the thoughts of any present individual, theology and science, make different claims about our past. Science suggests that it is all about favourable conditions for life happened at ‘one coordinate (space and time)’ and life originated. Theology says it is work of ‘God’ and life has been originated by will of ‘God’. Thus both differs in their explanations, for one it is statistical event and for another it is deterministic. But why it cannot be between two, which I am going to refer as deterministic – probable i.e. life evolved under such conditions which were decisive and composed of unique closed set of favourable conditions, but where it will evolve is based on statistical choice. How it will evolve is known, but when and where, it is again probability.
So, I am trying to suggest, there was always a consciousness
[2] since the beginning of universe, but its evolution towards higher end is a result of statistical phenomena. But the question is where this consciousness came to existence. Thus I propose, a small universe, smaller than an atom, plasmatic in nature, which expanded after Big Bang, contained the consciousness. Perhaps, the consciousness, which we as human observed or perceive, is trying to align and combine to the consciousness which existed before the birth of Real Time Universe. I will call this consciousness as ‘
Universal Consciousness’.
Our small universe, which contained consciousness, expanded exponentially (even at a higher rate) after Big Bang. So, all the entities, I will call their combined in a group as
Contity, which were responsible for maintaining consciousness inside the Universe, got uniformly dispersed along with light and matter
[3] in every direction but they did not leave the universe i.e. universe in mathematical sense, behaved like a closed set for all the entities. Wherever in the universe, all the physical or non-physical entities came together to form a contity, consciousness evolved.
Deterministic Probable approach can be only be convincing, if either of following can be established:
- Consciousness was always present either inside or outside the plasmatic universe.
- It evolved before Big Bang either inside or outside the plasmatic universe.
The probability, that some content of consciousness which may be referred as Higher Consciousness always existed seems high. It is quite evident, that this assumption will result in huge swing in favour of Deterministic Probable Approach. Hence, I have decided to analyse different possibilities, which atleast I can think of, for this topic. But my understanding suggests that there has to be some gist of consciousness and only that can lead to evolution. I personally don’t believe that we are monitored by any highly intelligent life form or part of any experiment conducted by them. That does not make any sense to me, since any analysis theological or scientific has agreed to some degree together that human body is the best possible medium from lower consciousness to highest level of consciousness. Theology ends up calling it “Salvation” and science, though still in theory, restricts degree of such process as calling it by “Evolution of Intelligence”. Here restriction means, science is not sure if evolution can really result in ‘Salvation” hence, it hesitates to stretch such process beyond a limit. So, on lighter half, if aliens are abducting humans to carry out experiment, then I am sure they will be studying humans to understand how the Intelligent Evolution happens and why they are deprived of such opportunity.
Next question is why consciousness has to be present before birth of real time space? I based my argument on ‘Deducible Proof’, as said by Dr. John Nash in Beautiful Mind, while proposing to his Girl Friend. I am an observer, like every human being. And I am well aware of the how scientific discoveries have happened. The nature has inspired people to study and explore its various forces. That inspiration is embedded in every human but very few go ahead being driven by such drive. Theology will say it was their destiny that they achieved such peaks. But when Science will formulate that then it will be stated as, such people realized the instinct embedded in them i.e. the consciousness invoked the process of awakening the instinct and they went ahead to take their realization or consciousness to next higher level. So, if we consider evolving to highest level of evolution, then we should be able to put the upper bound. But it does not seem possible and it should not be possible. So at what point we should decide that we are nearing the pinnacle. Well, according to me it should be that horizon where individual’s consciousness
[4] get submerged into ‘
Universal Consciousness’.
I will reiterate that only consciousness can lead to evolution. If we are not aware of anything how can we ever achieve it? Here awareness is result of consciousness. People will argue that we have evolved to attain the consciousness but again that leaves too much to chance. This will cause gaps which can be exploited by selfish people for misleading innocent people. Based on Consciousness or Deterministic – Probable Approach I will discuss many scenarios.
We all have been told or taught or even preached that universe is Infinite. And fortunately both theology and science concur on this. But is that really true? If an observer is lying inside the universe then no doubt that he will perceive the universe as Infinite. Again perception has more to do qualitative understanding rather than quantative. So I will put it as, for an observer inside the Real Time Space, Real Time Space is Infinite. But if I assume that an observer lies outside the Real Time Space, then for him nothing has changed. That is, he should still perceive the universe which existed before Big Bang, a miniscule plasmatic universe. So in other words, an observer lying outside the Real Time Space is not under influence of time hence for him nothing has changed ever. For such observer, everything is constant thus what ever happened before or after Big Bang is very much internal to Real Time Space.
In theory Real Time Space, before Big Bang, in plasmatic state was hot, hotter than we can even imagine. Hence, it is quite deducible that it was also unstable. For further explanation regarding ‘Unstable System’, I will like to visit control theory. In Control Theory, systems to be studied are first modelled mathematically. Then they are decomposed into state model as state models are easy to study and they represent internal states of the system. Thus control can be designed based on internal states of the system. Some systems are self-stable but some are not and they are called Unstable. Such unstable systems are always found to possess oscillatory behaviour in Control Theory. Hence, the control is designed to dampen the oscillations so that system can be stabilized. Thus, based on Control Theory, it can be proposed that:Now system instability clearly suggests that System was at harmony i.e. oscillating but had enough ability to absorb the magnitude of oscillations. But eventually it became unstable resulting in Big Bang. Now instability can be caused by external factors or system became unstable at its own. It is almost impossible to accept both the doctrines since it is hard to imagine what can be external factor and how a system which tends to be at rest will overcome the inertia to become unstable. But it would be interesting to look at every possibility:
“Real Time Space was oscillating before Big Bang. And when the magnitude of these oscillations became uncontrollable then the Big Bang happened.”
Now system instability clearly suggests that System was at harmony i.e. oscillating but had enough ability to absorb the magnitude of oscillations. But eventually it became unstable resulting in Big Bang. Now instability can be caused by external factors or system became unstable at its own. It is almost impossible to accept both the doctrines since it is hard to imagine what can be external factor and how a system which tends to be at rest will overcome the inertia to become unstable. But it would be interesting to look at every possibility:
1. Presence of Other Fully Evolved Universes: There were pre-existing fully evolved universes. They were in touch with each other and when time came for consciousness they realized none of them have enough coordinates to help consciousness evolve more. Thus they created another plasmatic universe, programmed it in such a way that it should evolve with attributes related to conscious evolution and caused the big bang. This is suggested in Figure G.1. Traveler is bound to make such assumption since he see everything connected with each other and concept of multi-universes. But this leaves a big question how the Fully Evolved Universes were created? So this understanding will take a hit as there will not be enough realization to explain the question. But this should not halt his progress since his purpose is to find ‘One’ responsible for everything.
Figure 1: Fully Evolved Universe and Plasmatic Real Time Universe
2. Collision of Universes: This can be obvious after observing chaos in initial stages and studying concepts like fusion
[5]. So like real plasmatic universe there were other plasmatic universe, they combined which resulted in instability of system and Big Bang happened. But this again will take a set back as per the reasons mentioned in the point 1 above.
3. Consciousness External to System: It is important to understand that consciousness never gets destroyed. This is based on famous theological doctrine that soul never dies. So what it means that there should not be any anti-consciousness
[6] like particle physics has discovered anti-matter whose association with matter results in annihilation of both. Does it suggest anything? Well yeah, it hints at the possibility that consciousness does not fully belong to real time universe else there would have been ‘something’ like physical particles responsible for anti-matter which would have resulted in its annihilation
[7].
Further adding to discussion, when the interaction between consciousness and real time universe happened
[8] that resulted in perturbation inside the plasmatic universe and evolution of ‘Contity’. Contity caused the consciousness to grow, consciousness further disturbed the universe and thus Big Bang happened
[9].
This understanding does not explain how the consciousness came into existence outside the plasmatic real time space. Also, though the interaction happened is it merely a probability or a planned event or forces like gravitation pulled consciousness and plasmatic real time universe towards each other. But whatever has been happened it has to be independent of time.
[1] The evidence of growing intelligence with every generation suggests that we are surely adding some degree of complexity at biological level. With intelligence rationality, the ability to reason has also increased. As well know no matter what logics cannot discover consciousness. So it further means the probability of exploring true essence of consciousness has surely decreased suggesting some degree of complexity has been added to find true potential of consciousness.
[2] Some may correlate with intelligent life from but I would like to emphasize that whatever intelligence we can think of should be part of any universe formed after big bang.
[3] Unfortunately Science does not talk about consciousness. Please remember consciousness should be something composed of the entities part of the universe.
[4] “The Consciousness”, mention in above paragraph, which helped genius and great people to realize their potential is nothing else but it was their destiny. The crux of thought streams, theology and science namely, is same but some people will never allow it to happen. But for one other will become blasphemy for one it will be like relying too much on Supreme Being which is non-existent. I am worried since few selfish people will never allow these streams to converge and hence 99% of us end up wasting an opportunity to raise our consciousness from one level to next level. That’s the reason we still are struggling to evolve at lower levels.
[5] Process where two atoms of same elements combine to form atoms of another element with enormous amount of energy
[6] Some may call the work of ‘
The Fallen One’ as anti-consciousness since it seems to destroy the consciousness. Well that is not correct since ‘
The Fallen One’ does not annihilate consciousness it just masks it. If it would have wiped it out then it would have never been realized by the individual. But there are people who have fought hard with ‘
The Fallen One’ and re-realized the consciousness. Many other can call ‘Death’ as anti-consciousness but it is not. More on this in discussed in chapter 5.
[7] This raises few points like isn’t it too bold to say that consciousness does not fully evolved inside the Real Time Universe? The proposition that it existed outside the universe before Big Bang supports theology concept of Supreme Being. No being can go out of the real time universe physically. Hence the probability of any being making it happen is nil but consciousness which is independent of any being can be present. Also no work has been initiated in physics, atleast no results have been made public, to model consciousness. It seems physicists are content in ignoring the consciousness as non-physical entity. So this proposition makes sense till the anti-consciousness particle is found.
[8] This suggests that consciousness is like ‘Cloud of Gas’ moving freely.
[9] This raises a question that why consciousness could not have just evolved only inside the plasmatic real space time universe. Well the first reason is already provided the non-existence or non-discovery of anti-consciousness particle. And second one is when consciousness is evolved at the highest level then it merges, where it merges, it merges into consciousness outside real time universe, which can be termed as Universal Consciousness. When the merger happens the time stops has no meaning and it is obvious since no time exists outside real time space.